Rachael McCallum's Unicorn Spew,
Rachael McCallum's UnicornSpew ~The online journal of Artness as-it-happens.
Thursday, 29 November 2012
Current thoughts on young people selling works
Selling works is how, as students , we gauge each others success. In the long line of life, I'm so often told, that not selling works whilst your only twenty is not a problem. That's easy for you to say when it's not going to decide your future. When your twenty, you know you have time to figure out if what your doing now is the life you want, and there is time to change if soon it feels wrong.
But when you make art you are essentially making what you want to, whatever it is, and expecting to find a kindred interest to buy it.
And so if you start life doing whatever you feel like and it feels wrong you have the option to begin doing what other people delegate to you or become the delegatee.
But unfortunately, if you have found happiness so-far-in-your-forever in making what-you-feel-like and you want to keep going in it, your leaving yourself extremely vulnerable to the opinions of others and their incentive to buy. Assuming that the person described is not supported by unknown magic funds that can be drawn at will, the young artists are left swinging their art between passion and pastime amongst the pastime job paradox.
Money makes the art world grounded.
Pastime jobs, part-time jobs, take up somuch more than just a part of your time. They suck you dry of the confidence you could have had, that you were-and are-capable of making money for yourself in your art. an attist is a lifestyle. Yiu cant just say im going to be one, you probably already are if you want to cmunicate with displays, it takes a lifetime to be efective. In that sense part time is an unfortunate title
Now back to the initial rant, assuming the subject isn't financially free, the young is doomed to waiting for that initial investment surprise. If that doesn't come soon enough, unfortunately that tall poppy will wilt.
It's essentially a filtering process where the determined and confident will prevail and the insecure will trail off.
But, I encourage you to, if you as a audience like a student work, at any age, purchase it or trade for it ! - so they can have the assurance that they are making desirable goods. It isn't about money, but confirming their skills are valuable! A note will do ♡♥
If you like it, do something about it!
Wednesday, 28 November 2012
Here is some sample pages of my most recent addition to this site; Studio Paper 2012
Tuesday, 27 November 2012
Most excellent joybeans of potential
Tomorrow is the big day where the graduates and I are awarded , bought and displayed to the public ! Business cards are in place, everything spare is painted white and students are gossiping. Today we all bubble around hoping we can eavesdrop in to the judges and find out who is awarded what or not.
On the way home today I was cranky that I was left out of the equation until a phonecall changes all that, I too am on the golden list!
Now to wait to see what...
Tomorrow, before all of the ceremony, I will upload the display of mine that is under such scrutiny... to give opportunityfor anyone else to comment.
Your welcome, haha! (Victoriously)
Saturday, 24 November 2012
Irritation, part of a series; Irritation, Deflation, Contemplation; Wall-hung Ceramic sealed vessel, Wire.
Yep, its a weird object, but really we didn't know how to start. I refused to make plates or flat things with print of oxide or ink because that is too direct, boring and simple for my attention span. We were searching for a way to convey the similarities of printmaking and ceramics but ended up with , at first glance, a cactus egg.
But - the beginning- which was the piece titled Contemplation, a burnished white egg shaped sphere with slight indentations, totalling half the size of a bowling ball. We sought to make an object- the epitome of which we figured was a ceramic thrown vessel that was simultaneuosly useless (which is what happens when ceramic vessels are too expensive to be functional anyhow) sealed whilst throwing. THis object was then drawn on by the polishing , engraving, and 'drawing' with wire. Wire was chosen because it is line. (when I think too much about line and its presence I cannot negate the fact that there is an inveitable physical depth in a line, even molecules thick when drawn with pencil, the only exception I expect is what is displayed in LCD screens). SO these lines were to coat the object in an abstract sense. We didnt want to draw anything particular so the wire drew what we essentially let it and the squiggles are great. the lines protrude to explain deeper marks made in the printmaking block.
This is so hard to put into words, I hope I havent lost you. I feel I have lost myself so I will try to be simpler, for all our sakes-
the vesseli made became the printmakers block and we drew line with wire to keep with the physicality of the object- you see if we drew with a 2d line it would be strange, print on 3, use 3d line.
I think that is the only way I can explain it.
THey are such interesting things- making a 2d print on the wall with a shadow, but this is only an afterthought.
Steven Bird published an article about the event in the online Journal of Australian Ceramics, issue 51/3, 2012. He quoted what we wrote about our works in the article, it may help explain what is going on:
http://australianceramics.com/home/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=175%3Aink-earth&catid=12&Itemid=93